|
Xfund’s humanities graduate entrepreneurs – the next generation of success
Xfund’s Humanities Graduate Entrepreneurs – The Next Generation of Success
By Douglas Hansen-Luke, Executive Chairman of Future Planet Capital
Imagine the chief executive of a brilliant new business nurtured at a university, and you probably think of a scientist or medic suddenly transformed into an entrepreneur. For anyone looking to build an investable, high-growth company, it can seem that the best preparation is to study physics, computer science or medicine.
The reality is rather different. Scientist and medic founders play a crucial role for any university investor. The Oxford COVID-19 vaccine, for example, directly resulted from the work of our portfolio company Vaccitech – created by professors Adrian Hill and Dame Sarah Gilbert. Its work contributed to the prevention of over six million deaths in a year.
But these are not the only people who can create businesses that answer big questions and promise significant growth. In fact, in the ‘universe’ of 13,000 university-affiliated enterprises that we track, 80% were founded by alumni of institutions, rather than current academics or scientists.
Many of those founders hold degrees in the humanities – not the sciences – and some are set to make a major impact on the wider world.
New thinking and a new focus
Our focus on these founders is no accident. Too many venture capital firms try to replicate the strategies of the likes of KPCB, A16Z, or Sequoia – chasing a small pool of scientific founders in a small geography. They hope to do as well as the first movers in this field, but many fall victim to the economic rule of diminishing marginal returns. Returns generated across the venture industry tell the story: only 10% of managers match or exceed the mean performance of their peers.
A new strategy is called for, and one of our principal partners in the US – Xfund – is showing what can be achieved with new thinking. It has achieved some of its biggest successes working with humanities students. Take Kensho, the artificial intelligence start up that achieved the world’s largest AI exit in 2018. Its founder, Daniel Nadler, launched the firm while finishing his Harvard PhD not in machine learning, but in economics. His approach to technology is informed by his experience as a published poet. Poetry – he argues – can teach us how to build a better search engine.
The key to Xfund’s success
“That liberal arts founders are spectacular is the hypothesis that we set out to prove,” says Xfund’s Managing Partner, Patrick Chung, who numbers graduates in classics, PPE and art history among his successful founders. “And so far, knock on wood, it’s proving out.”
The idea behind Xfund’s approach is straightforward. The firm targets exceptionally bright students who have emerged from universities that boast long track records of innovation. These founders can access networks and resources associated with their institutions and create real value. The combination of their personal achievements and their universities’ standing gives investors confidence.
Investing in under-represented founders
Thinking differently about where they choose to invest has another important consequence for Xfund. It goes out of its way to seek success among under-represented founders, investing ten times more in female-led companies than the industry norm. Some 58% of their dollars have gone to startups led by women, immigrants, or people of colour.
The approach works. These investments have an enviable record of success, with Anne Wojcicki of 23andMe is their most notable female founder. By investing in humanities students and seeking out under-represented founders they have been able to write the first checks and secure meaningful positions in a stream of winning companies.
The power of university funds
Science-based investors will always be vital to the work of Future Planet Capital. E14 at MIT and Berkeley SkyDeck are crucially important partners to us. Xfund’s approach helps to bring an additional multi-disciplinary mix. Together they allow Future Planet Capital to pursue our own strategy of connecting with early-stage university fund partners, then leveraging the research and value from their offerings.
This way we can follow and curate some of the most exciting companies to emerge from university ecosystems and then invest during their growth stages, at key inflection points where revenues and profits are ready to scale. For us, this diverse range of founders and strategies is the best way to fulfil our vision of funding the brightest minds to profitably address the world’s biggest challenges.
EdTech: Back to School
|
A Better Future Planet: Urgent need to reduce Emissions
|
The Research Programme for The Wei Forward II launched at the House of Lords
At the beginning of the month (5th July), Lord St John of Bletso, FPC Advisory Board Member, Lord Wei, FPC Executive Chairman, Douglas Hansen-Luke, FPC IGB Member Jerry Engel, and a room full of those from the worlds of insurance, pension funds, family offices and university innovation – to name a few – joined forces to launch research programme for the second instalment of the Wei Forward Report.
The breakfast event at the House of Lords was a great success and Douglas was able to use the meeting to update the attendees on the vision behind Future Planet Capital. Jerry, a world leader in entrepreneurship education, venture capital, corporate innovation and regional economic development visiting from San Francisco, also spoke eloquently about the importance of innovation clusters and praised FPC for helping connect such clusters around the world. Jerry also touched on how impact will be a key measurement for investors in the future, particularly as risk increases and investors work towards investments that help reduce systemic risk.
Lord Wei spoke about the success of the initial Wei Forward report, and the lessons learned from the first instalment. This included investigating the mainstreaming of impact and how to tackle the challenges of green-washing. Lord Wei also launched the research programme for the second instalment of the report and called on those in the room to get involved.
The Wei Forward II will conduct more in-depth research into the role of clusters within the innovation ecosystem globally (insurance, sovereigns, pension funds, and others), and will share greater learnings about clusters in geographies including Asia. The second report will also consider how a greater focus on the cost of living will affect key decision makers, as well as highlight impactful solutions that help the planet in ways that are sustainable for all of us.
The breakfast speakers were very well received by those in attendance and much interest was shown in collaborating on the report. Wide ranging questions and discussion took place, including on whether investment was encouraging greater blue sky thinking by affecting the willingness for shared ideas and collaboration; the relative role of measurement and metrics versus a more hands off approach; and inclusion and how the current system does or does not reach all possible entrepreneurs and investors (with Skydeck and MIT Solve getting a special mention for bringing founders into their platforms from around the world).
Lord Wei concluded the meeting by thanking all those in attendance, particularly the panellists and Lord St John of Bletso who kindly hosted the morning.
Now is your chance to get involved - The second instalment of the Wei Forward Report will be drafted over the next 6 months, following a number of roundtables around the world. We very much welcome input and you can learn more or contribute by getting in touch with Jess – j.hill@futureplanetcapital.com.
Meet Dr Steven Chance, the Founder and CEO of Oxford Brain Diagnostics
Meet Dr Steven Chance, the Founder and CEO of Oxford Brain Diagnostics, the company “bridging the gap between life and death”, at the forefront of early stage Alzheimer’s diagnosis technology.
Oxford Brain Diagnostics is an Oxford University spin out that has developed unique algorithms and software, collectively called Cortical Disarray Measurement (CDM) that analyse MRI brain imaging data, giving clinicians, pharmaceutical companies and Biotechs unprecedented insights on a cellular level. The patented technology, utilising over 10 years of research, is used for the early detection of Alzheimer's disease, and also has the ability to track the disease's progression.
Global estimates suggest that 416 million people around the world are on the Alzheimer’s disease continuum, and yet there is currently no reliable way to test for AD, essential for discerning appropriate treatment. Additionally, CDM would give clinical trials the ability to more successfully diagnose and understand the patient cohort, allowing them to reliably determine the efficacy of the drug or treatment.
With their Series A round on the horizon, we spoke to the founder, Dr Steven Chance about his journey developing CDM, founding Oxford Brain Diagnostics and his future plans for the company.
“It sounds quite dramatic, but my decision to develop CDM could be described as an attempt to bridge the gap between life and death. I did my PhD in Oxford, looking at two technologies. One was looking through the microscope at tissues dissected from the brains of people who had died with disease or without disease, looking at the differences on a cellular level. The other was looking at MRI brain scans of the living and analysing in real time the changes within their brains as they were affected by disease. The frustrating gap between these technologies was that the detailed information you can see through the microscope was just not available from MRI scans. I wanted to find a way to gain access to that cellular data within the lifespan of the patient, so we could actually help them.”
OBDs primary commercial objective has always been to provide clinical diagnostics solutions to hospitals, a goal that looks set to become reality as their technology has received FDA Breakthrough Device status, prioritising their application for regulatory approval in the US.
“The Breakthrough Device status means that the FDA has not only recognised the value of the science but it is also validation for the potential of clinical use.”
While they wait for regulatory approval, analysis has already been conducted into the distribution of US hospitals, target states and distribution of the elderly who will be more at risk of neurodegenerative conditions,
Additionally, they are already gaining commercial traction with other clients across the globe.
“I think I’m most proud of having gained really good commercial traction even at this early stage because a lot of R&D companies don’t achieve that. We’ve taken a very proactive approach and have received really good uptake with pharmaceutical companies, in some cases very big pharmaceutical companies paying six figure sums to do exploratory work with us but also we have now progressed to being an endpoint for a Phase 2 AD clinical trial for one of the big Biotech firms in the USA.”
This is “only the beginning” of the potential of the Cortical Disarray Measurement technology. While Oxford Brain Diagnostics are currently focused on dementia, specifically Alzheimer's disease, the technology is applicable to an entire range of neurological diseases. Their pharmaceutical dealings include a platform sale for Parrkinson’s disease and as the company grows, they plan to launch services in conditions such as Multiple Sclerosis.
It hasn’t always been smooth sailing though as Steven elaborates on the challenge of building the perfect team.
“Getting the team together is essential and I brought in a real commercial team that had all the strengths that complement each other - I think that’s a major challenge that had to be overcome quite early on”
“I spent some time pulling together the leadership team in the company. Our Chairman, Andrew Barker has been involved with previous successful Oxford University imaging spin outs, for example, intelligent ultrasound and currently with Brainomix. So he has a lot of experience in this space and understands about the challenges that are faced when selling into hospital systems and so forth with these technologies”
“My Chief Science Officer is Dr Ged Ridgway, he has many years experience really focussed on imaging dementia - it’s his fundamental research area and he’s worked in Cambridge, London, Oxford all previously”
“My Chief Technology Officer, Ian Hardingham actually started a computer game company when he first stepped out of doing computer science at Oxford University, which was successful but he wanted to get into some more serious technology. Coming from that experience of understanding how to get something to work through the internet, across the world, in the cloud - he’s brought all that expertise to our software.”
“Finally, my Chief Commercial Officer, Omar Ehsan, has spent more than 25 years selling into pharma companies so he has really been a lynchpin in terms of gaining that early commercial traction.”
The experience of the Oxford Brain Diagnostics team is what has generated the vital difference between CDM and the other technologies in this space. Specifically Steven emphasises the importance of his research work at the Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford University neuropathology lab, spanning over 15 years.
“It’s important to know that Alzheimer’s disease is only a confirmed diagnosis at the post-mortem autopsy stage and it is the neuropathologist that provides that confirmatory assessment; until then, there is only a probable diagnosis - wrong 10%-20% of the time. What we did is we designed a technology built on that post-mortem neuropathology - we worked backwards and brought that process forwards into life. Very few, in fact I don’t think any other technologies out there have that kind of essential foundation.”
“A lot of new methods tend to approach things using AI, feeding MRI scans into machine learning algorithms. We have patented algorithms uniquely designed for this purpose based on the foundations of post-mortem neuropathology. These aren’t concepts that can purely be found or discovered by AI. There just isn’t enough post-mortem MRI data out there in the world for someone to discover the same algorithms or insights using an AI approach. ”
“Other technologies attempt to use the old-fashioned or traditional assessment of looking at brain size and volume which is the typical way people have used MRI scans in the past. As the neurodegenerative process happens at the cellular scale, there must be a huge amount of damage for that to scale up to something you can see as a sort of overall reduction in brain size.”
CDM assesses both the quantity and quality of brain tissue, enabling them to detect early markers and indicators of future change. It also means they have the “resolution to spot the differences in patterns across the brain structure” allowing them to qualify the stage that the patient is at, as well as differentiate between different kinds of dementia such as Alzheimers compared to frontotemporal dementia.
“Many other techniques purely don’t have this capability which is essential for accurate diagnosis and therefore appropriate treatment”
Looking forward, Oxford Brain Diagnostics have clear objectives as they shift into their growth phase.
“We want to achieve regulatory approval which will launch our clinical sales, particularly with the FDA in the United States. We will continue to follow that on with Japan and Europe where we have had, in some cases, surprisingly good traction setting up pilot projects.”
“We want to build on the existing Pharma and Biotech success by continuing those sales and expanding them to other neurodegenerative diseases such as Multiple Sclerosis”
“We want to gain clinical acceptance, so we are establishing pilots with hospitals in Japan, in the US, we also have an NIHR funded project here which is nice additional undiluted funding, helping to establish us within the UK hospital and NHS system”
“In the broader scope, we would look to our philosophy - rethinking brain health - and that is because the technology itself applies not just to neurodegenerative conditions but also potentially to psychiatric conditions, neurodevelopmental conditions, these are things like schizophrenia or autism. I’ve done work in those areas previously and we know we have the data, what's striking is that 25% of the entire world’s population will encounter one of these diseases in the course of their lifespan. We want to tackle this global challenge.”
Pictured Dr Steven Chance, CEO of Oxford Brain Diagnostics outside their offices
Global Innovation & Local Action
|
Venture Capital Can Help Protect Our Oceans and Build a Sustainable Blue Economy
The ocean is a key environmental and economic resource that covers more than 70% of our planet. Despite contributing to 100 million people’s livelihoods and sequestering 80% of the world’s carbon, the ocean has been largely neglected by venture investors.
Historically, companies and projects working to protect the ocean were grant funded, but we are witnessing an influx of capital and interest in sustainable blue ocean business, known as the ‘blue economy’. Last year, Future Planet Capital committed $40 billion of capital to climate investing. Now we are seizing an opportunity to be an early adopter in the ocean impact investing space and want to encourage others to do the same.
The Future Planet Capital Blue Ocean fund, launched in February 2022, focuses on three key areas of opportunity within the blue economy: preventing pollution, preserving of marine environments and ecosystems, and sustainable marine productivity. In our investment strategy we focus not only on large financial returns, but compelling companies that make a real difference to people and to the planet. This is what’s known as impact investing.
We see clear opportunities to reduce problems in the ocean such as pollution of fishing stocks by microplastics and “ghost” fishing gear, and also in creating sustainable sources of protein, and improving the health and local economy of coastal habitats and communities through sustainable aquaculture. We also see companies innovating in the long term sequestering of carbon in the ocean, enabling renewable energy or displacing unsustainable shipping practices.
At Future Planet we look beyond simple Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) to the positive impacts the product or service will have in an upside case. We may measure carbon reduction using a carbon pricing model, for example.
Ukraine, the Covid-19 pandemic fallout and supply chain disruption have led to rising inflation, increasing interest rates and stock market falls, all adding up to significant market uncertainty. We believe this in turn presents significant opportunities for those of us deploying capital to exceptional founders tackling the challenges in health, security and sustainable growth.
Climate change and blue economy impact investing will be well positioned in this market. Investors in this space can find true value by zoning in on the most important issues – reducing greenhouse gas emissions, finding sustainable sources of food, protecting biodiversity and creating energy sources that do not put our lives, or the environment in further danger. Injecting capital in these areas will help improve the health and wellbeing of human populations, reduce harm from the changing climate, and provide long-term financial returns. It’s a win-win.
By Ed Philips & Andy Muir, Future Planet Capital
Solve at MIT 2022: working together to profitably solve Global Challenges
|
Technology: Changing the fight against Cancer
|
Does Vaccination Increase Inequity?
|
Future Thinking: Blue Ocean Economy
|
Future Thinking: Vaccines, Infectious Diseases & Healthcare Innovation
|
Future Thinking: EdTech
|
The Wei Forward: Impact Report
Why impactful investing is the way forward in 2022
by Lord Nat Wei of Shoreditch, Advisory Board Memeber Future Planet Capital
With the unprecedented levels of change inflicted by the COVID-19 pandemic, rapidly shifting geopolitics, and the race to get to net zero since COP26, it is clear the world needs to accelerate its innovation and development processes to protect our planet and the human race. Businesses, governments, and NGOs must work together urgently to find solutions.
But there is a vital tool at our disposal that is grossly underused: impactful investing. Innovation and new, disruptive technologies are critical in making progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the climate-specific pledges made at COP26, to decentralising our healthcare system to immunise it from future lockdowns, and to make our supply chains and energy systems more resilient to combat inflation and rising living costs. Yes, there has been admirable progress in many areas, but the fact remains that today the technologies simply do not exist to achieve Net Zero in the developed world cost-effectively, or to combat the next pandemic more effectively than we have done so far. World leaders have talked the talk; now researchers, engineers, business leaders and investors need to walk the walk for them. This is where impactful investing comes in.
Experience tells us the greatest technological progress is made by start-ups and scale up businesses, with solutions that government, corporates, and society can get behind when they are needed. Backing innovative solutions to solve pressing issues requires joint action. There must be a concerted effort made by all these stakeholders to unlock impactful investment. Imagine what would happen if we found and unleashed more Kate Binghams (herself a venture capitalist) and the innovative companies they could help us direct resources to not just to procure new vaccines but to revamp the NHS? Or find ways to heat our homes and power our grid more efficiently. Or ultimately help keep taxes low by helping us transition as a country to be more resilient and agile in the face of climate change and future supply and other shocks?
Government should look to play a larger role as a procurer of innovation and encourage impactful venture investing with green and impactful-oriented tax breaks. Pensions industry regulators should take a more balanced risk approach and favour impactful investing so there is a decent world for the pensioners of the future to live in while also boosting the long-term value of their pensions. To not do so, given the societal and planetary risks we face, is a risk itself; one that the regulatory system should be accountable for, alongside protecting the immediate financial returns and assets of members.
Finally, it is essential that society has a more active role in holding legislators, regulators and board members to account, using tools such as the Companies Act 2006, Section 172. All too often we have seen company directors knowingly ignore their duty to help society and the environment, in favour of ill-gotten benefits for a few, just as big tobacco did decades ago. This cannot continue, and customers know it.
The investment community itself has a major role to play. It must look at how best to scale the field of impact, transforming it from a niche, historically less focused on profit asset class, to a
mainstream practice centred around high impact, high profitability, and large global funds. This may require adapting and simplifying approaches; as Tom Beagent, a leading expert in impact at PwC, rightly says: “All investments make impact, good or bad – impact investing is about creating more positive impact.” This transition may also require a reconciliation in academic research between what works practically on the ground for investment professionals and entrepreneurs, and what drives them both financially and socially. This is needed to align incentives amongst the investors, and the investors and the market. It is not a zero-sum game.
But we must be positive and not despair about the challenges ahead. We have the talent, skills and resources, and there are already key players leading the charge such as Future Planet Capital (FPC), who have exemplified a pragmatic approach to creating solutions to huge global challenges, marrying profit and purpose. Whilst the marked growth of impactful and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) considerations among investors is encouraging and actors, like FPC, look to generate positive change, we, as an investing community, should remain mindful not to overpromise. It is essential that progress is meaningful and long-term rather than superficial or a ‘quick fix.’
Much of the responsibility for pushing impactful investing rests with VC investors and founders. However, everyone must act responsibly and be accountable. The potential for policymakers, regulators, LPs, pension funds and consumers to play an influential role in bringing impact to mainstream adoption must be recognised and harnessed. A culture change will be needed in Whitehall, in the City, and in the wider country, and there will be bumps along the way as we seek to procure differently, invest more purposefully, and demand those who govern us to be more solutions-focused. We are just at the beginning and the road ahead may seem long, but we must start having joined-up conversations about how we may all endeavour to deliver this change, with impactful investing providing a potential very practical way forward into 2022 and beyond after major shifts caused by Brexit, Covid, and COP26.
By Lord Wei, Author of the Wei Foreward report published by Future Planet Capital.
Fusion Energy- The Future of the World's Energy
The UK Innovation & Science Seed Fund (UKI2S) first invested in Tokamak Energy over a decade ago when fusion energy companies were few and far between. We knew it would be a long haul, but we always believed that momentum would build. So we are delighted to see that there are now multiple companies who between them have raised well over $4 billion, with the last few weeks seeing a flurry of announcements from Helion, Commonwealth Fusion Systems and General Fusion with some very large sums being bandied around. These financings are very welcome news and reinforce the growing perception that fusion energy has moved from the realm of science fiction to that of an engineering problem. In other words there is confidence that time and money and application will deliver a viable source of carbon free energy at some point in the not too distant future.
Of course this is not going to be tomorrow but sometime in the next decade. And the engineering needed to get there is non-trivial. From power electronics and AI systems capable of controlling unstable plasmas through to radiation resistant materials for the inner walls of the reactors, there remains a huge amount of work to be done. Much of it will need to be done in collaboration with government labs and academia, but there will also be massive opportunities for the private sector to be innovative suppliers to the fusion companies. This has the potential to create technology leaders in fields outside fusion, perhaps before fusion itself is realised.
TAE Technologies have already spun out a company TAE Life Sciences, using TAE’s particle accelerator technology to create a compact neutron source that can be used to target boron-doped tumours more accurately. Elsewhere, one of the most interesting enabling technologies is the magnets that confine the plasma and the materials that they use. High temperature superconducting (HTS) materials first emerged in the lab about 40 years ago but have been a wonder material struggling to find a sufficiently attractive application. But the compact tokamak devices being developed by Tokamak Energy and Commonwealth Fusion Systems use HTS magnets and the know how being applied to magnets for fusion is already sparking thoughts of other applications ranging from space propulsion systems to portable MRI scanners that could save lives at the roadside.
At UKI2S we have already invested in two start-ups that are a by product of the race to fusion, in the form of Luffy AI and Qdot Technology. Qdot’s expertise lies in thermal management and they are looking to bring the skills used to design the exhaust system for fusion reactors to bear on current problems such as the charging cycle for EV batteries. Whilst Luffy, whose founders emerged from UKAEA’s Culham site, are developing a neural network that could be transformative in improving robotic and industrial controls.
The word “moonshot” is over-used and is often taken to mean something that is binary in outcome. Win big or lose all your money, in other words. Fusion energy is definitely a big win, no doubt about that. But it is also a moonshot in the sense of the Apollo Space programme, which gave us core aspects of our daily lives in the form of the silicon chip, fly-by-wire and freeze-dried foods, all of which were either direct creations of the programme or massively accelerated by it. Fusion technologies could do the same and give us new capabilities few of us will even have on our horizons. Watch this space.
By Mark White, Investment Director at UK Innovation & Science Seed Fund (Future Planet Group)
The Democratisation of Venture - Is it Time for the Industry to Grow Up?
Future Planet Capital was founded with the vision of connecting the world’s biggest investors to the brightest minds to address global challenges profitably. In our early years this meant targeting sovereign investors and governments, pension plans, corporates and, in partnership with Barclays Private Bank, ultra-high net worth individuals. But there is one “biggest investor” group that until now we have not and covered and that is the “Crowd”. In this blog, I explore the importance of democratising access to venture and what that means in terms of economic efficiency and financial inclusion.
How Big is the Crowd?
According to Bloomberg and the Securities and Exchange Commission, throughout much of 2021 the share of total equity volume traded by individual investors in America has been well above 20%. In a market worth well over $30trillion, that makes individual or retail investors very big indeed. In the US, the poster child for retail investors is Robin Hood who have over 22m clients or 8.5% of the adult population. In Britain, CrowdCube and Seedrs have financed some of the country’s biggest success stories most notably Revolut, the next-generation bank whose stock market value now exceeds that of all but one of Britain’s traditional banks.
In short, the Crowd is big, very big.
Why Democratise Venture?
From a Future Planet Capital perspective, with our eyes on the world’s biggest investors then it makes absolute sense to find channels to market to this Crowd, to find ways to democratise venture.
For the industry as a whole, it also makes sense. As The Economist’s lead article this week makes clear, 7 of the world’s top 10 companies were venture capital backed. This is great but the traditional investor base for venture capital is geographically centred on Silicon Valley and driven largely by ultra-high net worth individuals and endowments. In more recent years, Chinese-led corporations, such as Alibaba or Tencent, have overtaken Californian investors. This makes the industry highly dependent on a small number of names and their enthusiasm will be driven by fashion, feast and famine depending not only on their own financial well-being but political and tax considerations too.
For individuals, the fact that so much of the world’s increase in wealth has come from private markets has further accelerated income and wealth equality.
It’s not good for the industry to be dependent on a handful of billionaires and their companies and even less so for the ordinary individual who has no access to this deal-flow. For both diversified, more stable economic growth and for fairness, it would make sense for venture to be democratised.
Democratisation in Practice
From 2022, Future Planet Capital will be making 10% of its deal flow available to individuals via crowdfunding platforms. For sophisticated individuals this can be on a deal-by-deal basis. For purely retail investors with limited wealth it will be via long-term diversified investment products. For the first time, individuals will have the same privileged access to impact and innovation companies emerging from the world’s top universities and research centres. Our launching partner, Seedrs, with whom we’ve raised our own Series A, has just been acquired by Republic, the US based private investment platform. With these partners and others, we expect over time to provide fair access to top deals.
Over the long-term, however, our ambition is to link venture capital products to long-term individual savings plans. For those saving for a pension with a multi-decade time-horizon and no need for liquidity, diversified-venture portfolio’s are surely an effective way to fund individuals’ long-term liabilities.
Groups such as MakeMyMoney matter are also advocating for individuals to take control of the ethical implications of their investments and the impact of their financial commitments. Indeed for many this is the biggest way that they can make a difference to the challenges of climate change, education, health, security and sustainable developments.
So, perhaps paradoxically, for venture capitalists, for the industry as a whole, for individuals and for the planet, democratisation of venture is a key stage in the institutionalism and scaling-up of an important asset class.
By Douglas Hansen-Luke, Executive Chairman
Future Thinking: Terra Carta
Venture Capital Battles in the Fight Against Climate Change
Future Planet Capital were honoured to have been invited to #COP26 by His Royal Highness, Prince Charles, to support his work with #terracarta and the Sustainable Markets Initiative. There we showcased seven companies that were able to make a clear impact in facing down the challenge of climate change.
Where were the venture capitalists?
Sifted recently wrote that apart from ourselves and a small number of others the #venturecapital industry failed to make an appearance at COP26 and lamented that this key driver of innovation was noticeably absent. Aside from ourselves, General Atlantic were present and they announced a $4bn late-stage venture #climatechange fund. Few of Europe's top 40 sustainable venture groups made it to COP26. Does this reflect an industry failing?
What is the venture industry doing?
I say "No". In fact venture is already making considerable investments in climate change and is further aware of the wall of funding destined to follow from asset managers, corporates and governments. The industry is on the right track and as detailed in the forthcoming Lord Nat Wei's report "The Wei Forward" there are many practical paths for impactful investment to follow, be measured and be recognised.
In our own portfolio and pipeline we number nuclear fusion, sustainable fashion, circular supply chains, smart materials, smart cities and agritech companies as all capable of making an impact through improved energy usage, reduced emissions, circularity, fixing food and protecting the environment. There is a shortage of dealflow relative to demand but it cannot be said that venture is ignoring climate change or failing to make a difference. Instead it is performing a valuable purpose in ensuring that only the best, most practical, most impactful, companies get the majority of funding.
The Business and Sustainable Development Commission estimates that $45 trillion needs to be invested in addressing climate change by 2030. This money can be sourced from the $130 trillion that the Glasgow Finance Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) has pledged by 2050 but it needs to find routes for deployment.
The solution is in our hands...
And it is here that Venture can be helped by all those governments, corporates and indeed activists who attended COP. Through a series of nudges more funding can be released and rushed to innovative technologies targeted to beat climate change.
One of the most effective actions available to governments would be to free occupational pensions to invest more in venture. In the UK alone over $1 trillion is managed by local government pensions but their allocation to venture is minimal. This needs to change but in a highly conservative industry this needs encouragement from government. For corporates, similar nudges are required. At all annual general meetings shareholders who talk of engagement must insist on an #ESG policy and one which explicitly targets #netzero. A great example of leadership comes from Arcelik Global and its CEO, Hakan Bulgurlu. Awarded a Terra Carta award for their vision this top 3 manufacturer of air-conditioners and white goods has pledged to be fully carbon neutral within a decade.
And, in the final analysis, it is activists and individual consumers who will make the biggest difference. As voters, activists at shareholder meetings, as employees or through purchasing decisions, individuals in their millions can influence the largest governments and corporations.
So, "Yes", venture is making a difference to investing in impact and innovation but, individuals, all of us, are able to influence, lead and accelerate everything the industry does.
By Douglas Hansen-Luke, Executive Chairman
Future Thinking: Sustainable Growth
|
